🔗 Share this article

"Half of my life is saved on Snapchat, and now they expect us to cover the cost for it."

Poor feedback and a feeling of unfairness have taken over online discussion since the app became the newest tech firm to introduce fees for a feature that people previously utilized for free.

The company behind Snapchat announced in September that it would require payment from users if they have over five gigabytes of saved photos and recordings stored as the Memories feature.

Among numerous users, these past uploads serve as a portal to bygone days – prompting some to criticize the company of "profit-driven motives" in messages on digital networks and poor reviews on mobile app marketplaces.

Other Choices

Snap has likened its subscription options to those offered by Apple and Google for handsets.

And as an alternative for those who don't want to pay, subscribers have the ability to export their archived media – which for certain users amount to tens of gigabytes – to their own hardware.

Snap stated that only a minority of users would be impacted by the new policy.

It also acknowledged that it was "always challenging to move from accessing content at no charge to subscribing to it" – but proposed it would be "justified by the benefits" for users.

Numerous denouncing the change online seem to disagree.

User Backlash

A digital campaign labeled the fee a "memory tax", with participants labeling it "Orwellian" and "outrageous" – while one person threatened to quit the app again.

In parallel, in a poor evaluation on the Google Play store, a user calling themselves an online commenter said it felt "very unethical".

"As a member of that generation, most of us have years worth of personal moments on the platform," they said. "The vast majority only continued using Snapchat mostly for that reason. 5GB is absolutely nothing when you have a long timeline of recordings... Farewell Snapchat."

Additionally, Guste Ven, a university student media studies major in the UK capital, shared on TikTok her decision to remove the app.

"I decided that I needed to download all my archived media as quickly as possible," she explained. "The vast majority of my teenage years have been recorded through my saved snaps, all of the pictures in there are deeply meaningful to me."

"It just doesn't make sense to introduce fees individuals for a service that has been free for so many years."

Uncertain Costs

The company has not yet said how much storage plans would cost in the Britain – only that they are part of a "phased international launch".

However a London resident a different individual, who also lives in the city, said in a post on the social platform that she would be "distraught" by the new costs.

She noted that the platform had become "integrated into daily routine" since she began accessing it in several years ago.

Despite admitting she accepted the app needed to earn income, she indicated that the saved content option holds greater significance than the corporation may have understood.

"I think it's quite an unfair step to impose fees on your customers who have been consistent and engaged," she said. "This feature is more than a name, these are our actual memories."

Professional Insight

Companies choosing to require payment from subscribers for a service that was previously free is a frequent occurrence, and numerous people subscribe to platforms like iCloud and Google Drive to save their images and clips from their handset.

The reality of keeping information in the digital storage – which various commentators in the technology sector like to refer to as simply "an external server" – is that it involves expenses.

"Hosting enormous quantities of Memories on the platform isn't a trivial amount," social media consultant Matt Navarra commented. "The company has to attempt to identify a method to cover the cost of storage, bandwidth, back-ups, media distribution, encryption – everything involved."

But the consultant indicated that imposing charges for a function that had once been complimentary, and users had been prompted to utilize as such, may appear as a "misleading tactic" for some.

"Changing the rules after people have built this massive online collection doesn't really sit right," he said. For numerous users, he continued, "Memories aren't just data dumps, they're emotional artefacts."

The feeling was shared by those leaving negative feedback, with a user describing their saved images and clips "the most precious thing to me".

"These archives contain each part of my personal journey within them from happy occasions such as new additions, mourning of passed loved ones, experiences shared with close ones, [and] my whole teenage years," they commented.

Academic Insight

Dr Taylor Annabell, a university scholar at Utrecht University in the Holland, said that the company's action highlights the consequences of commercial platforms being used to store sentimental personal content.

"Platforms gain from this reliance, interdependence, and assumption of perpetual availability, which even encourages some users to continue using the app or keep accessing it in order to scroll back through their archive," she explained to the media. "However these are not charitable custodians of personal memory."